Submitted by kpaul.mallasch on Tue, 10/16/2007 - 9:18pm.
Cities: IndianapolisCounties: Marion CountyMFP Tags: SPJ, Society of Professional Journalists, S 2035, Mike Pence, HR 2102, Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, Free Flow of Information Act, federal media shield bill, Congressman Mike PenceTopics: GovernmentTypes: News
Cities: IndianapolisCounties: Marion CountyMFP Tags: SPJ, Society of Professional Journalists, S 2035, Mike Pence, HR 2102, Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, Free Flow of Information Act, federal media shield bill, Congressman Mike PenceTopics: GovernmentTypes: News
SPJ Leaders Praise House Representatives for Passing the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007
INDIANAPOLIS, IN - Leaders of the Society of Professional Journalists are pleased with today's passage of the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007. The legislation was introduced in May by Reps. Rick Boucher (D-Va.) and Mike Pence (R-Ind.). With 71 co-sponsors, the bill was passed today by a landslide vote of 398 to 21.
"Today's vote in the House is a victory for a free press and for the American people as much as journalists," SPJ President Clint Brewer said in reaction to the vote. "This law is in the interest of democracy. Journalists must be able to protect confidential sources in order to truly report on the operations of our government. This will allow journalists to do their jobs without fear of prosecution from the very federal government they are covering."
The Society still awaits a full vote on S. 2035, which passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee on Oct. 4. This bill is also known as the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007.
"Protections provided by the Free Flow of Information Act I submit are necessary so that members of the media can bring forward information to the public without fear of retribution or prosecution, and more importantly, so that sources will continue to come forward," Rep. Pence said in a House speech today. "Compelling reporters to testify, and in particular, compelling them to reveal the identity of confidential sources, is a detriment to the public interest. Without the promise of confidentiality, many important conduits of information about our government will be shut down. The dissemination of information by the media to the public on matters ranging from the operation of our government to events in our local communities is invaluable to the operation of democracy. Without the free flow of information from sources to reporters, the public will be ill-prepared to make informed choices."
The House version of the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, or the federal shield bill, would protect the public's right to speak out and promote the people's right to know. It calls for a qualified privilege that would make it easier for journalists to protect the identities of their sources and the information provided by those sources.
In the past year, SPJ has raised more than $30,000 to support a campaign for the passage of a federal shield law. The work to ensure passage of such a law is ongoing. To learn more about SPJ's efforts, please visit SPJ's Shield Law page.
"Journalists and engaged citizens should continue to let Congress know that a free press is vital to a healthy democracy," Brewer said. "SPJ's national leaders will continue to work toward passage of the shield law."
The shield, as drafted, may apply not only to traditional print, television and radio journalists, but also may include coverage for freelancers and bloggers.
Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have various statutes that protect journalists from being forced to testify or disclose sources and information. No statutory protection currently exists for federal cases.
Source: SPJ Press Release
Technorati Tags: News Congressman Mike Pence federal media shield bill Free Flow of Information Act Free Flow of Information Act of 2007 Government HR 2102 Indianapolis Marion County Mike Pence S 2035 Society of Professional Journalists SPJ - ‹ previous
- 2701 of 3858
- next ›
- Email this Story
- 301 reads
Free Flow of Information
Check out this article from C-Net..
By August the bill had been amended to refine who would and wouldn't qualify as a journalist. The new language stated that only those who who derive "financial gain or livelihood" from their journalistic activity would be covered. Journalism students would no longer be covered, nor would many bloggers. It's important to note, that though these changes were finalized in August, as cpmaz reports, the revised bill wasn't posted online until October 10.
Since then, two more amendments have been introduced that will further erode the bill. One introduced by Representative Boucher (VA) and Pence (IN) (sponsors of the original bill) adds that the journalist must depend on his craft for a "substantial portion of the person's livelihood or for substantial financial gain" (emphasis is mine). I don't know what the definition of substantial financial gain, but there are countless journalists who must rely on other work to supplement their income after entering the professional world. In fact, the Society of Professional Journalists continues to offer student membership rates for two years following graduation for this very reason.
I wasn't aware of the changes. What if we're poor and trying to do journalism?
I've emailed Pence's office to get their view on this. I wish they woulda let me know they were changing it, though. I guess I should've watched it more closely. So many things to do to get that 'financial...livelihood' going!
-kpaul
Post new comment