MFP Tags: Race Card, Gender, Marketing Candidates, Obama, Clinton, McCainTopics: Undefined
Marketing Candidates: Playing The Race/Gender/Maverick Card
Throughout this presidential campaign, people have offered criticism of the major candidates based on stereotypes. Barak Obama has been accused of “playing the race card" (pardon the overworked cliché). Hillary Clinton was called the iron maiden and seen as too cold and calculating. John McCain’s campaign almost miscarried because he was seen as George Bush’s third term.
It’s all true. Obama did base some of his campaign on race, and
In
In order to appeal to women,
Last fall McCain’s campaign was approaching moribund status, he pulled it out of the nose dive, by appealing to his long-established maverick image. He spoke about how he had taken on Rumsfeld, by criticizing his management of the
We may decry the fact that campaigns are run with marketing principles not unlike the way commercial products are sold, but the fact is they are. We cannot blame candidates from engaging in the game using the rules that exist. If they did not do so they would soon be ex-candidates. If we want the system to change, we must change it. Candidates will not do so. Indeed, they could not do so, even if they wanted.
- Bob Hertzog's blog
- Email this Blog entry
- 325 reads













Technorati Tags:
If the point of this
If the point of this article is that politicians use advertising strategies in their campaigns, then it is well taken. And there is really no need to change that aspect of the system. We need a President who can advertise themselves and their opinions well in the world market, if you will. We suffer when our President does a poor job of presenting US views and when we lose to PR campaigns to other nations and agendas.
The problem that needs to be changes, in my view, is the negative approach of campaigning. How McCain or Clinton or Obama present themselves is ultimately their own decisions but when one candidate or campaign tries to misrepresent another, the trouble begins. When, for example, Senator Clinton tries to insinuate that Senator Obama is a Muslim (or at least, that this possibility exists) after he has denied it repeatedly, this is not advertising strategy; it is a smear campaign. The infamous 3AM ad is more of the same. I don't mind if Senator Clinton tries to play up her experience; this is a wise approach. But when she tries to discredit Senator Obama's experience a la Swift Boat or when President Clinton describes Senator Obama's clear opposition to the Iraq war as a "fairy tale", this is advertising run amok. It is one thing for Coke to extol their product or even to compare it to Pepsi; it is another thing altogether to suggest that drinking Pepsi might be risky.
We need to clean up negative politics because negative poltics quickly becomes negative governance. One side remembers election slights and vows revenge on the newly elected President. Nothing ever gets accomplished, except posturing and bickering. How you win an election determines how you will govern.
I must agree and disagree with the statement that "If we want to change the system, we must change it. Candidates will not do so." Senator Obama has based his campaign on changing exactly many of those things that you decry. He is willing and able. And if he wins, he will win differently and therefore he will be able to govern differently. He will be able to promote cooperation and bi-partisanship and calm discussion. And even when agreement and compromise cannot be achieved, he will erase much of the bitterness that has accumulated over the years, especially the Clinton and Bush years. Still, he cannot do it without each and every voters help. One vote can make a difference. Indiana can and will make a difference this year! Stand up and vote your hopes and not your fears. Change will come if we make it come. I guess it all depends on where we stand and how much we care and if we are willing to do what it takes.
Post new comment